· 6/14/2010
Bernhard v. Brown & Brown of Lehigh Valley, Inc.
Citations
- 720 F. Supp. 2d 694
- 23 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 875
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58308
- 2010 WL 2431821
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It would be entirely against the import of the ADA if [claimant] were not considered qualified because he was not able to perform his essential job functions during his leave, as leave itself was the accommodation requested by [claimant].”
- “It would be entirely against the import of the ADA if [the plaintiff] were not considered qualified because he was not able to perform his essential job functions during his leave, as leave itself was the accommodation requested . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gene E.K. Pratter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.