Bernays v. Feild

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a special master does not have discretion to “ignore entirely significant evidence that contradicts a finding.”
• awarding $85,000.00 for pain and suffering and $336.20 in past unreimbursable medical expenses
• “[t]here is little doubt that the decisional law in the vaccine area favors medical records created contemporaneously with the events they describe over subsequent recollections.”
• “[t]here is little doubt that the decisional law in the vaccine area favors medical records created contemporaneously with the events they describe over subsequent recollections.”
• “[t]here is little doubt that the decisional law in the vaccine area favors medical records created contemporaneously with the events they describe over subsequent recollections”
• “There is little doubt that the decisional law in the vaccine area favors medical records created contemporaneously with events they describe over subsequent recollections.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).