Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “the subsequent appellate proceedings manifest[ed] the appellant’s intent to appeal” an order he failed to identify in his notice, giving the opposing party “a full opportunity to brief the issue”
• tuition reimbursement claim accrued when parents moved child to private school and placed in issue their dissatisfaction with student's IEP by petitioning for administrative hearing
• “We think more than two years, indeed, more than one year, without mitigating excuse, is an unreasonable delay.”
• \[M]ere notice of parental - 16 - 'dissatisfaction' does not alone put the Board on reasonable notice. . . . [T]he right of review contains a corresponding parental duty to unequivocally place in issue the appropriateness of an IEP.\
• reviewing in limine rulings for abuse of discretion
• reviewing in limine rulings for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).