Bernards v. Summit Real Estate Management, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment for the defendant on an 7 intentional interference claim because the plaintiff failed to establish the first element of 8 the claim—a valid contract
• “The duty to sue does not arise * * * when 'success’ would be of‘little or no net value.’”
• “An inferable conclusion is more than a suspicion, a suggestion, a speculation, or a conjecture; a conclusion is inferable from facts if the conclusion can be logically deduced from the facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Azure Dolphin, LLC v. Barton
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-12-07· cited 49×
• Munson v. Valley Energy Investment Fund, U. S., LP
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-13· cited 19×
• WSB INVESTMENTS, LLC v. Pronghorn Development Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-02-25· cited 11×
• Bundy v. Nustar GP, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-27· cited 9×
• Nationwide Insurance Co. of America v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-13· cited 6×
• State ex rel. Rosenblum v. Johnson & Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-11-25· cited 6×
• Goings v. Calportland Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-31· cited 3×