Bernardi v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “section 1910.212 [is] a general ‘catchall’ or ‘gap-filler’ intended to impose a point of operation guarding requirement in any case where a hazard exists and guarding is feasible.” (emphasis added)
• \section 1910.212 (is) a general 'catch-all' or 'gap-filler' intended to impose a point of operation guarding requirement in any case where a hazard exists and guarding is feasible.\ (emphasis added)
• “[A]s the product of a private organization, ANSI guidelines are dependent for their observance on the voluntary compliance of the affected employers.”
• “Given the wide variety of sources for the initial standards package and the rapidity of its promulgation, we would be frankly surprised if there were not anomalies.”
• section 6(a) “required adoption of ‘established Federal’ and ‘national consensus’ standards without substantive modification”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).