Bernard M. Baum and Daniel S. Shulman v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that mutual fund shares are not commodities
• affirming dismissal and explaining that Sections 2(c) is restricted to tangible goods like Section 2(a)
• mutual fund share is not a “commodity” under § 2 [a] of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13 [a] [1970]
• the term “commodity” is “restricted to products, merchandise or other tangible goods”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).