Skip to main content
· 2/19/1986

Bernard M. Barenholtz v. The United States

Citations

  • 784 F.2d 375
  • 9 Cl. Ct. 375
  • 57 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 824
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 20004

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing the exception to the general rule regarding collater-alization with tax-exempt securities
  • government may make upward adjustments to taxable income in years closed by the statute of limitations to determine tax liability in open years
  • government may make upward adjustments to taxable income in years closed by the statute of limitations to determine tax liability in open years
  • “The fact that [plaintiff] used the tax-exempt bonds as collateral is direct evidence of the prohibited purpose.”
  • “Tt is well settled that the IRS and the courts may recompute taxable income in a closed tax year in order to determine tax liability in an open year.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Markey, Smith, Nies

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.