Bernal v. Vankar Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting employee’s motion for summary judgment because employer did not counter motion “with any evidence that [it] affirmatively informed each server” of the tip credit requirements
• granting summary judgment for plaintiffs because, in part, “[t]he Court cannot say that any reasonable juror would find that Defendants disclosed their intention on the face of the pay stubs or reprinted checks”
• granting summary judgment for plaintiffs because, in part, “the Court cannot say that any reasonable juror would find that Defendants disclosed their intention [to take the tip credit] on the face of the pay stubs or reprinted checks”
• “Additionally and alternatively, summary judgment on the issue is appropriate because the unrebutted evidence establishes that Defendants deducted losses due to cash register shortages and unpaid tabs from Plaintiffs’ paycheck[s] or nightly tips.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).