Bernadette Williams v. Kenneth Apfel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding remand for award of benefits is appropriate only where the record “provide[s] persuasive evidence of total disability that [would render] any further proceedings pointless”
• holding remand for award of benefits is appropriate only where the record “provide[s] persuasive evidence of total disability that [would render] any further proceedings pointless”
• refusing to remand for an award of benefits because the record did not “provide[] persuasive evidence of total disability that rendered any further proceedings pointless”
• directing remand for further proceedings where the record was not entirely persuasive with respect to the plaintiff’s disability
• permitting an award of benefits where “the records provided persuasive evidence of total disability that rendered any further proceedings pointless”
• permitting an award of benefits where “the records provided persuasive evidence of total disability that rendered any further proceedings pointless”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).