Berman v. Parco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying plaintiffs leave to add a negligence claim to their complaint due to new information discovered during a deposition as plaintiffs could have alleged such claim in the alternative at the outset
• “Prejudice may be found, for example, when the amendment is sought after discovery has been closed”
• “Prejudice may be found, for example, when the amendment is sought after discovery has been closed”
• “[T]he Court may deny a motion to amend when the movant knew or should have known of the facts upon which the amendment is based when the original pleading was filed, particularly when the movant offers no excuse for the delay.”
• “[T]he court may deny a motion to amend when the movant knew or should have known of the facts upon which the amend- ment was based when the original pleading was filed, particularly when the movant offers no ex- cuse for the delay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).