Skip to main content
· 3/22/1976

Berman Corp. v. State ex rel. State Highway Commission

Citations

  • 24 Or. App. 813
  • 547 P.2d 192
  • 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 2455

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court did not have duty to sua sponte continue trial to permit defendant to subpoena expert witness to support his case
  • trial court did not have duty to sua sponte continue trial to permit defendant to subpoena expert witness to support his case
  • where the defendant did not renew his motion to compel the appearance of a witness or seek a continuance to prepare the foundation for the anticipated testimony, the court did not abuse its discretion in declining to declare continuance sua sponte to enforce subpoena

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fort, Schwab, Thornton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.