Berliner v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in addressing whether mailing of Board order complied with ORS 656.295(8), we observed, \Claimant is the only party claiming that he did not receive the order; his attorney asserts that he did not receive it either.\
• in addressing whether mailing of Board order complied with ORS 656.295(8), we observed, “Claimant is the only party claiming that he did not receive the order; his attorney asserts that he did not receive it either.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Haskell Corp. v. Filippi
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-01-07· cited 4×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Forney v. Western States Plywood
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-08-28· cited 17×
• Forney v. Western States Plywood
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-12-14· cited 10×
• Spivey v. SAIF Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-06-04· cited 10×
• Wilson v. State Accident Insurance Fund
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-10-27· cited 9×
• Berliner v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-04-20· cited 1×