Berkowitz v. United States
Citations
- 93 F. 452
- 35 C.C.A. 379
- 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2016
Syllabus
<p>1. Criminal Pleading — Autrefois Acquit.</p> <p>A sworn statement by a defendant that he was on a certain date arraigned and acquitted on an indictment specified in the statement, in the same court in which the second trial occurs, and that the “offence to which he is now called upon to defend the facts and circumstances is * * * the same offence of which he was heretofore acquitted” is properly to be treated as a plea of former acquittal.</p> <p>2. Same — Former .Jeopardy — Misdemeanors.</p> <p>The fifth amendment of the Constitution of the United States providing that no person shall be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb applies to misdemeanors as well as treason and felony.</p> <p>3. Conspiracy against the United States — Misdemeanor.</p> <p>As at common law a conspiracy to commit a misdemeanor or felony was only a misdemeanor, so conspiracy under Bev. St. § 5440, not being declared a felony, is also merely a misdemeanor.</p> <p>4. Criminal Law — Merger of Offences.</p> <p>The doctrine of merger of offences does not apply as between misdemeanors, and hence a misdemeanor which is the object of a conspiracy is not merged in the latter offence, nor is the offence of conspiracy merged in such consummated misdemeanor.</p> <p>5. False Naturalization Certificates — Uttering—Misdemeanor.</p> <p>Bev. St. § 5424, providing that any person who utters, sells, etc., any false naturalization certificate shall he punished, etc., not having declared such offence a felony, and having repealed the former acts making it such, the offence was reduced to a misdemeanor.</p> <p>6. Same — Former Acquittal.</p> <p>An indictment under Bev. St. § 5440, charging a defendant with conspiring to utter as true false naturalization certificates in violation of Id. § 5424, charges an offence different from that under the latter section, and hence an acquittal on the indictment for such conspiracy is not a bar to a subsequent prosecution for the offence of
Judges: Acheson, Aoheson, Bradford, Dallas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Greene v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1907-06-03· cited 67×
- United States v. OffuttD.C. Circuit· 1942-04-13· cited 30×
- Waldeck v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1924-09-12· cited 15×
- Robinson v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1909-07-26· cited 15×
- Steigman v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1915-01-30· cited 14×
- United States v. ShevlinD. Massachusetts· 1913-06-12· cited 11×
- Myers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1925-10-02· cited 10×
- United States v. YorkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1904-06-17· cited 5×
- People v. VossCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1934-11-13· cited 4×
- United States v. BullingerE.D. New York· 1923-02-08· cited 1×
- United States v. LopezD. Puerto Rico· 1918-04-17
- United States v. HoshiD. Hawaii· 1909-11-17
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Berkowitz v. United States
11 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Berkowitz v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1937-06-10· cited 12×
- Berkowitz v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1925-05-02· cited 1×
- Berkowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-10-12· cited 1×
- Berkowitz v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 2010-10-25
- Berkowitz v. United StatesW.D. Pennsylvania· 1975-04-28
- Berkowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-10-07
- Berkowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-10-07
- Berkowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-10-07
- Berkowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-10-07
- Berkowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-01-19
- Berkowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-01-19
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.