Berko v. Freda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The intervening criminal act of a third person does not insulate a defendant if such intervening act is reasonably foreseeable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Berko v. Freda
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-05-09· cited 123×
• Trainor v. Santana
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-06-15· cited 24×
• Blunt v. Klapproth
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-03-03· cited 21×
• Berko v. Freda
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1982-01-25· cited 8×
• Chipps v. Newmarket Condominium Ass'n
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-05-11· cited 5×
• Bonney v. Canadian National Railway Co.
  D. Maine· 1985-07-18· cited 4×
• Trainor v. Santana
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1980-07-01· cited 2×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Krauth v. Israel Geller and Buckingham Homes, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1960-01-11· cited 199×
• Walters v. Sloan
  California Supreme Court· 1977-11-28· cited 157×
• Braitman v. Overlook Terrace Corp.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1975-10-09· cited 97×
• Zinck v. Whelan
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1972-08-23· cited 43×
• Whitten v. Miami-Dade Water & Sewer Auth.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-03-28· cited 34×
• Ferraro v. Demetrakis
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1979-04-17· cited 32×
• State v. Gooze
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1951-06-21· cited 28×
• Wilson v. Florida Processing Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-03-06· cited 19×
• Dwyer v. Erie Investment Co.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-12-15· cited 11×
• Palmisano v. Ehrig
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1979-10-25· cited 6×