Berkley Regional Specialty Insurance Co. v. Dowling Spray Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court improperly considered testimony of an employee to declare intent of coverage under the policy because the plain and ordinary meaning of the policy was unambiguous
• holding that road accident between motorcy- cle and John Deere tractor used for spraying crops was not covered under operation exception because sprayer was not in operation but rather traveling as land vehicle
• holding that road accident between motorcy- cle and John Deere tractor used for spraying crops was not covered under operation exception because sprayer was not in operation but rather traveling as land vehicle
• “Extrinsic evidence must not be considered when the language of a contract is unambiguous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).