Skip to main content
· 8/2/2012

Berkley Regional Insurance v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance

Citations

  • 690 F.3d 342
  • 2012 WL 3126739
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 15998

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that, “in order for an insured’s breach to defeat coverage, the breach must prejudice the insurer in some tangible way”
  • noting that the argument that the insurer could still participate in the appeal rang hollow
  • finding prejudice in a late-notice case in the insurance context even though “we cannot fully know what effect, if any, [a party’s] participation would have had on [the mediation] process”
  • “[I]n order for an insured’s breach to defeat coverage, the breach must prejudice the insurer in some tangible way.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higginbotham, Haynes, Higginson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.