· 8/2/2012
Berkley Regional Insurance v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance
Citations
- 690 F.3d 342
- 2012 WL 3126739
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 15998
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that, “in order for an insured’s breach to defeat coverage, the breach must prejudice the insurer in some tangible way”
- noting that the argument that the insurer could still participate in the appeal rang hollow
- finding prejudice in a late-notice case in the insurance context even though “we cannot fully know what effect, if any, [a party’s] participation would have had on [the mediation] process”
- “[I]n order for an insured’s breach to defeat coverage, the breach must prejudice the insurer in some tangible way.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Higginbotham, Haynes, Higginson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.