Utah Supreme Court· 1/17/1980
Berkeley Bank for Cooperatives v. Meibos
Citations
- 607 P.2d 798
- 1980 Utah LEXIS 847
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that negligence-based defenses, like intervening and superseding causes, are not proper defenses to intentional torts
- stating that bank officers indicated to defendants that their personal signatures on the notes were not for collection purposes but to ensure the defendant farmers would continue to ship milk to cooperative
- “The issue of actual reliance and the reasonableness of the reliance is, of course, for the jury to determine.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart, Wilkins, Crockett, Maughan, Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In the Matter of Rodney Dale Coston and Billie Katherine Coston, Debtors. Rodney Dale Coston and Billie Katherine Coston v. Bank of MalvernFifth Circuit· 1993-07-13· cited 153×
- Von Hake v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court· 1985-08-22· cited 69×
- Gold Standard, Inc. v. Getty Oil Co.Utah Supreme Court· 1996-01-11· cited 46×
- Union Bank v. SwensonUtah Supreme Court· 1985-09-27· cited 43×
- Conder v. A.L. Williams & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah· 1987-06-25· cited 40×
- DeBry v. Cascade EnterprisesUtah Supreme Court· 1994-07-01· cited 34×
- Donner v. NicklausTenth Circuit· 2015-02-19· cited 29×
- State v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1997-06-26· cited 28×
- Moore v. Burton Lumber & Hardware Co.Utah Supreme Court· 1981-05-22· cited 28×
- Printcraft Press, Inc. v. Sunnyside Park Utilities, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court· 2012-07-02· cited 26×
- Cerritos Trucking Co. v. Utah Venture No. 1Utah Supreme Court· 1982-03-18· cited 22×
- Eie v. St. Benedict's HospitalUtah Supreme Court· 1981-11-02· cited 14×
- House of Flavors, Inc. v. TFG Michigan, L.P.First Circuit· 2011-06-23· cited 6×
- Reagan v. Bankers Trust Co.D. Utah· 1994-04-27· cited 6×
- Iadanza v. MatherD. Utah· 1993-04-29· cited 6×
- Haupt v. HeapsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2005-10-14· cited 6×
- England Logistics v. Kelles Transport ServiceCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2024-10-03· cited 5×
- Galloway v. Afco Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah· 1989-07-05· cited 4×
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. KearlCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1995-05-25· cited 4×
- Alta Health Strategies, Inc. v. KennedyD. Utah· 1992-04-14· cited 4×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pace v. ParrishUtah Supreme Court· 1952-08-01· cited 118×
- Jardine v. Brunswick CorporationUtah Supreme Court· 1967-02-07· cited 39×
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ShaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1876-06-02· cited 39×
- Stuck v. Delta Land & Water Co.Utah Supreme Court· 1924-03-11· cited 38×
- Equitable Life Ins. Co. of Iowa v. Halsey, Stuart & Co.Supreme Court· 1941-03-03· cited 27×
- Bob v. HolmesMichigan Court of Appeals· 1977-09-08· cited 27×
- Cessna Finance Corp. v. MeyerUtah Supreme Court· 1978-02-16· cited 24×
- Lewis v. WhiteUtah Supreme Court· 1954-04-30· cited 22×
- Kilpack v. WignallUtah Supreme Court· 1979-11-16· cited 19×
- State v. BruceUtah Supreme Court· 1953-11-05· cited 18×
- Gay v. Young Men's Consolidated Co-operative Mercantile InstitutionUtah Supreme Court· 1910-02-11· cited 14×
- Rodgers v. HansenUtah Supreme Court· 1978-05-23· cited 13×
- Campbell v. Safeway Stores, IncorporatedUtah Supreme Court· 1964-01-17· cited 12×
- Greenwell v. DuvallUtah Supreme Court· 1959-04-23· cited 7×
- GENERAL APPLIANCE CORPORATION v. Haw, Inc.Utah Supreme Court· 1973-11-29· cited 4×
- BEEHIVE SECURITY COMPANY v. BushUtah Supreme Court· 1965-03-30· cited 4×
- Packaging Corp. of America v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court· 1977-03-04· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.