Skip to main content
· 6/2/1998

Berke v. Presstek, Inc.

Citations

  • 188 F.R.D. 179
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22568
  • 1998 WL 1110096

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiff group with the largest financial interest was not formed in bad faith because two individuals in that group “would still have the ‘largest financial interest’”
  • noting that transfer for purposes of consolidation seemed appropriate given the facts of the case but should not be granted absent further briefing from the parties
  • aggregation appropriate where, even without aggregation, two individual members would be able to claim the largest financial interest
  • “In other words, by enacting the PSLRA, Congress sought to encourage class members with the largest purported losses to act as lead plaintiffs in private securities litigation.”
  • “Although a transfer pursuant to § 1404(a) is typically premised on the motion of a party, the statute is broad enough that a court can transfer a case on its own initiative.”
  • “Although a transfer pursuant to § 1404(a) is typically premised on the motion of a party, the statute is broad enough that a court can transfer a case on its own initiative.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McAuliffe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.