Skip to main content
· 1/2/1962

Berke v. Bregman

Citations

  • 406 Pa. 142
  • 176 A.2d 644
  • 1962 Pa. LEXIS 661

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Because the words \without recourse\ were used by the maker of an instrument, \they have no fixed legal significance and the lower court correctly accepted evidence to explain away the resulting ambiguity.\
  • Because the words “without recourse” were used by the maker of an instrument, “they have no fixed legal significance and the lower court correctly accepted evidence to explain away the resulting ambiguity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, Alpern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.