· 1/2/1962
Berke v. Bregman
Citations
- 406 Pa. 142
- 176 A.2d 644
- 1962 Pa. LEXIS 661
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Because the words \without recourse\ were used by the maker of an instrument, \they have no fixed legal significance and the lower court correctly accepted evidence to explain away the resulting ambiguity.\
- Because the words “without recourse” were used by the maker of an instrument, “they have no fixed legal significance and the lower court correctly accepted evidence to explain away the resulting ambiguity.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, Alpern
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.