Skip to main content
· 2/1/1966

Bergman v. Parker

Citations

  • 216 A.2d 581
  • 1966 D.C. App. LEXIS 126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that appellant had not made his duty to obtain building permits a condition precedent to performance of the contract
  • rejecting appellant’s claim that it was impossible to obtain building permits as “[t]here [was] no question that building permits could have been issued after modification of existing plans”
  • refusing to hold that contract was impossible due to inability to obtain building permits, when “[t]here [was] no question that building permits could have been issued after modification of existing plans .... ” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hood, Quinn, Myers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.