Berglind v. Paintball Business Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that insured whose “only experience . . . with insurance is merely purchasing the CGL policy for the paintball facility from an insurance agent” was not sophisticated
• noting that the insured had never owned real estate and was a high-school dropout
• “notice provisions are not merely technical requirements but, rather, conditions precedent to the triggering of the insurer’s contractual duties”
• “notice provisions are not merely technical requirements but, rather, conditions precedent to the triggering of the insurer’s contractual duties”
• “notice provisions are not merely technical requirements but, rather, conditions precedent to the triggering of the insurer’s contractual duties”
• “notice provisions are not merely technical requirements but, rather, conditions precedent to the triggering of the insurer’s contractual duties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).