· 3/13/2002
Berghausen v. Microsoft Corp.
Citations
- 765 N.E.2d 592
- 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 393
- 2002 WL 387244
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the plaintiff “does [not] offer argument explaining why Microsoft’s ‘implicit representations’ would fit within the [DCSA] definition of deceptive acts”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mattingly May
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.