· 9/30/2002
Berger v. Xerox Retirement Income Guaranty Plan
Citations
- 231 F. Supp. 2d 804
- 28 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2729
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18402
- 2002 WL 31165120
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that, as a rule, motions for reconsideration “do nothing but express dissatisfaction with a prior ruling and ask the court to change its mind”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Herndon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.