Berger v. Stephan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying de novo review in a partition action under previous version of statute, but recognizing that 2009 amendments to ORS 19.415 changed standard of review
• summarily rejecting the defendants’ contention that Oregon was an inconvenient forum because it was premised on an incorrect assertion about the basis for the plaintiffs’ claim
• Under the parol evidence rule, “all oral negotiations or stipulations between the parties preceding or accompanying the execution of the written contract are regarded as merged in it.” (internal citation, brackets, and quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).