Berger v. Pierce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiffs failed to offer evidence that Novartis’s better and earlier warnings would have altered the treating oncologist’s decision to prescribe Aredia®
• noting that Ethicon admitted that Restatement § 6(c
• disregarding cross- 20 references, noting “this attempt to incorporate various documents by reference that include arguments related and unrelated to the current issues 21 before the Court circumvents this Court’s local rules governing page limits.”
• the doctor prescribed ongoing Zometa treatment in the same dose and frequency years after the plaintiff developed ONJ and the plaintiff continued to take Zometa after being explicitly warned of the risk of ONJ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).