Skip to main content
· 12/2/1910

Berger v. Metropolitan Press Printing Co.

Citations

  • 61 Wash. 35
  • 111 P. 872
  • 1910 Wash. LEXIS 1278

Syllabus

<p>Appeal — Decision—Law of Case. Tbe decision of tbe supreme court on a former appeal becomes tbe law of tbe case.</p> <p>Appeal — Review—Verdict. A verdict upon conflicting evidence, sustained by tbe respondent's testimony, will not be reversed on appeal.</p> <p>Master and Servant — Negligence—Vice Principal — Person in Authority. Where an employee in a printing sbop was ordered by tbe foreman to work under tbe directions of a pressman, tbe latter was a vice principal wben be called upon tbe former to belp put a belt upon a pulley.</p> <p>Master and Servant — Safe Appliances — Factory Act — Application. Tbe factory act, Rem. & Bal. Code, § 6587, requiring belt shifters in a factory, mill, or workshop where machinery is used, applies to a main power shaft in a printing sbop.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The need for diagnostic examinations, of course, must be supported by the testimony of competent medical experts.”
  • “Emotional distress is a reasonably foreseeable injury to a car-accident participant ….”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dunbar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.