Skip to main content
· 4/1/1895

Bergemann v. Backer

Citations

  • 157 U.S. 655
  • 15 S. Ct. 727
  • 39 L. Ed. 845
  • 1895 U.S. LEXIS 2217

Syllabus

<p>When a prisoner is indicted in a state court for murder, it is for the courts of the State to decide whether the indictment sufficiently charges that,; crime in the first degree.</p> <p>In view of the decisions by the highest court of New Jersey, referred to in the opinion, declaring the meaning and scope of the statutes of that State under which the accused was prosecuted, it cannot be held that he was proceeded against under an indictment based upon statutes denying to him the equal protection of the laws, or that were inconsistent with due process of law, as prescribed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.</p> <p>The refusal by-the state court to grant a writ of error to a person convicted of murder, or to stay the execution of a sentence, will not warrant a court of- the United States in interfering in his behalf by writ of habeas corpus.</p> <p>When a state court has jurisdiction of the offence and the accused under an indictment found under statutes of the State not void under the Constitution of the United States, and proceeds to judgment under such statutes, a Circuit Court of the United States has no authority to interfere with the execution of the sentence by means of a writ of habeas corpus.</p>

Judges: Harlan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.