Berg v. Xerxes-Southdale Office Building Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a pro forma statement—in that case, a projection of cash flow—could be actionable “depending upon whether [it] accurately reflect[s] surrounding past and present circumstances”
• holding that a pro forma statement — in that case, a projection of cash flow — could be actionable “depending upon whether [it] accurately reflects] surrounding past and present circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).