Skip to main content
· 2/5/1998

Berg v. MTC Electronics Technologies Co.

Citations

  • 61 Cal. App. 4th 349
  • 71 Cal. Rptr. 2d 523
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 1318
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 986
  • 1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 92

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]f there is a mandatory forum selection clause, the test is simply whether application of the clause is unfair or unreasonable, and the clause is usually given effect.”
  • “[T]he normal application of the principle of contract interpretation that calls for avoiding constructions which create surplusage of one clause in a contract so as to render another clause in the same contract surplus.”
  • “ ‘The company [MTC] has expressly submitted to the jurisdiction of the State of California and United States Federal courts sitting in the City of Los Angeles, California, for the purpose of any suit, action or proceedings arising out of this Offering.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zebrowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.