Berendsen v. Nichols

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reducing award by 15% in light of respondent’s financial condition and because awarding full fee would unduly limit respondent’s ability to support his children
• reducing award by 15% in light of respondent’s financial condition and because awarding full fee would unduly limit respondent’s ability to support his children
• reducing award by 15% in light of respondent's financial condition and because awarding full fee would unduly limit respondent's ability to support his children
• reducing award by 15% in light of respondent’s financial condition and because awarding full fee would unduly limit respondent’s ability to support his children
• refusing to make an upward adjustment to the lodestar, noting ICARA cases were not unprecedented for petitioner’s counsel, the law did not appear to be complex, and the case was short-lived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).