Berdahl v. Berdahl
Citations
- 2024 ND 73
Syllabus
When this Court has made a legal pronouncement and remanded a case for further proceedings, the parties may not relitigate the issue and the district court is required to follow the terms of our decision. The district court has some discretion on the procedures used on remand. However, that discretion is not without bounds and must be exercised within the scope of our decision. Adverse or erroneous rulings do not, by themselves, demonstrate bias of a district court judge.
Judges: Crothers, Daniel John
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Siewert v. SiewertNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-12-16· cited 50×
- Carlson v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-10-01· cited 30×
- Berdahl v. BerdahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-07-07· cited 24×
- Frisk v. FriskNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-07-21· cited 16×
- Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2016-06-02· cited 14×
- Investors Title Insurance Co. v. HerzigNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-01-23· cited 8×
- Pennington v. Continental ResourcesNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-06-10· cited 6×
- Sorenson v. SlaterNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-11-15· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.