Skip to main content
· 9/27/2013

Berbick v. Precinct 42

Citations

  • 977 F. Supp. 2d 268
  • 2013 WL 5510764
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143955

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “Counsel’s reliance upon informal discovery does not preclude approval of [a] proposed [settlement”
  • “[A] defendant’s promise to do that which the law already requires is not a valuable benefit.”
  • “[A] defendant’s promise to do that which the law already requires is not a valuable benefit.”
  • “Ordinarily, a defendant’s promise to do that which the law already requires is not a valuable benefit.”
  • “Counsel’s reliance upon informal discovery does not preclude approval of the proposed Settlement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.