BEPCO, L.P. v. Santa Fe Minerals, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the statutory language [of § 1447(C)] is unambiguous, and therefore must be enforced according to its terms”
• holding that the district court was within its statutory authority to remand in this circumstance
• concluding that if an “independent and authorized reason for remanding [a] case to state court” exists, “the district court’s remand order is unreviewable” even if another basis was also referenced by the district court
• declining jurisdiction where remand was based on § 1447(c) ground not raised in the timely filed motion for remand
• “We conclude that the statutory language [of § 1447(c)] is unambiguous, and therefore must be enforced according to its terms.”
• “Any order issued on the grounds authorized by Section 1447(c) is immunized from all forms of appellate review, whether or not that order might be deemed erroneous by an appellate court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).