Benvin v. United States District Court (In Re Benvin)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reassigning where the court improperly inserted itself into plea negotiations and had “expressed explicit views on the appropriate terms” of an eventual agreement
• reassigning where the court improperly inserted itself into plea negotiations and had “expressed explicit views on the appropriate terms” of an eventual agreement
• reassigning where the court improperly inserted itself into plea negotiations and had “expressed explicit views on the appropriate terms” of an eventual agreement
• granting mandamus and finding that “the court’s suggestion that the parties add a particular term to the plea agreement constitutes impermissible involvement”
• granting defendant’s mandamus petition and finding that his choice between trial and a less-favorable plea agreement did “not provide [him] adequate relief and [could] cause prejudice not correctable on appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).