Bentzien v. City of Honolulu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “an alleged credit reporting practice was facially permissible, but could nevertheless violate the discharge injunction if its objective effect is prohibited, i.e. if it really serves to pressure the debtor to pay a discharged debt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).