Benton v. Benton
Citations
- 78 Kan. 366
- 97 P. 378
- 1908 Kan. LEXIS 64
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Promissory Note — Time of Payment Not Conditional. A written instrument by which the maker acknowledges an indebtedness and agrees to pay it as soon as. he can is to. be ■ construed as a promissory note payable within a reasonable time. ' '</p> <p>2. Pleadings — Action on a Note — Defendant’s Financial Ability to Pay. In an action upon such an instrument the plaintiff is not required to plead that the defendant has the financial ability to pay it.</p> <p>3..- Wayit of Consideration. A promissory-note recited as its consideration a personal indebtedness owing by the defendant to the plaintiff. In an action thereon the answer alleged that the note was given without consideration, and set out additional facts showing that at the time of its execution the defendant held the amount of the note in trust for the plaintiff and another person. Held, that the answer was good as a plea of want of consideration, and that the recital of a personal indebtedness in the note did not conclusively establish a settlement of the trust.</p> <p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>WILLS — Construction. Upon a question involving the interpretation of a part of a will reading “I . . . make the following disposition of my property . . . eight thousand dollars to wife, all of which is to be held in trust by J. O. and H. H. Benton without bond — they to pay heirs such rate of interest as shall be agreed upon, until children become of age — and she remains unmarried' — -in such case money shall fall to my legal heirs,” held, that the words “in such case” are equivalent to “in case she remarries.”</p>
Judges: Mason
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Nelson v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Kansas· 1913-04-12· cited 36×
- Banque Russo-Asiatique v. DolchNinth Circuit· 1925-01-05· cited 18×
- Greenstreet v. CheatumSupreme Court of Kansas· 1916-12-09· cited 12×
- Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad v. PitzerOhio Court of Appeals· 1943-12-17· cited 5×
- Benton v. BentonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1911-05-06· cited 4×
- Allen v. Estate of AllenAppellate Court of Illinois· 1920-03-09· cited 3×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Smithers v. JunkerU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois· 1889-12-15· cited 20×
- Horner v. StarkeyIllinois Supreme Court· 1861-11-15· cited 18×
- Eckler v. GalbraithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1876-03-23· cited 16×
- Rolfe v. PilloudNebraska Supreme Court· 1884-01-15· cited 15×
- Walker v. FreemanIllinois Supreme Court· 1904-04-20· cited 13×
- Veasey v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court· 1855-06-11· cited 10×
- Halladay v. WeeksMichigan Supreme Court· 1901-07-02· cited 10×
- Barnett v. BullettIndiana Supreme Court· 1858-12-10· cited 5×
- Scott v. ThorntonTennessee Supreme Court· 1900-05-19· cited 5×
- Work v. BeachNew York Supreme Court· 1891-03-13· cited 4×
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of KnabNew York Surrogate's Court· 1902-10-15· cited 3×
- Chism v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1898-09-23· cited 3×
- Governor ex rel. Hannah v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1811-07-01· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.