Bentley v. United Refining Co. of Pennsylvania

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing a Section 1981 claim because the plaintiff “completed his intended purchases” and “mere delay, even coupled with 9 discourteous treatment, poor service, or racial animus, is insufficient to sustain a § 1981 claim” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).