Bentley v. Sill
Citations
- 35 Ill. 414
Syllabus
<p>1. Landlord and tenant — eviction. Where a landlord demised certain premises to be used as sleeping rooms, owning at the time of the demise but three of the walls, and having no easement in the fourth; the roof of the premises demised being built upon and against the fourth wall, and the owner of the fourth wall in raising his building, having necessarily broken in the roof of the demised premises and rendered the demised premises unfit for the purposes for which they were leased : Held, that the tenant when he rented the building, had a right to suppose his lessor was the owner of the four walls inclosing it, or if not that he had an easement in the wall; that it was the lessor’s duty when the owner of the fourth wall raised his building to meet the exigency and protect his tenant; that this disturbance of the premises was equivalent to an eviction and suspended to that extent the payment of the rent.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \the machinery of the criminal law cannot be properly invoked for the redress of merely private grievances\
- “the machinery of the criminal law cannot be properly invoked for the redress of merely private grievances”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bkeese
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.