Bentley Mark Jenkins v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Endrew F. has not changed or eliminated our circuit’s use of the ‘reasonably calculated’ factors as we announced them twenty-two years ago in Michael F.”
• “[W]e hold that Endrew F. did not eliminate, nullify, nor modify this circuit’s practice of applying the Michael F. factors when evaluating the sufficiency of a child’s [program].”
• “Although the district court is required to give due weight to the hearing officer’s findings, the [district] court ultimately must arrive at its own independent decision based on the preponderance of the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).