Bentham v. Hertz Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a taking of property constitutes a “theft offense” under section 101(a)(43)(G
• noting that temporary takings qualify as “theft offenses” even though they have traditionally not been considered turpitudinous
• finding that a conviction under section 10851 of the California Vehicle Code was for a theft offense
• noting that “the state courts have repeatedly concluded that this specific intent [to permanently deprive] can be presumed whenever one unlawfully takes, or attempts to take, the property of another”
• conviction under Cal. Veh.Code § 10851(a) qualifies categorically as theft offense within meaning of § 1101(a)(43)(G)
• defining “theft offense” using the same language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).