Skip to main content
· 5/4/1990

Benson v. Northern Gopher Enterprises, Inc.

Citations

  • 455 N.W.2d 444
  • 1990 Minn. LEXIS 127
  • 1990 WL 56073

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the ―thoroughness of the trial court‘s exploration of [an] issue‖ justified deference even though the appellate court ―may have reached a different conclusion‖
  • reviewing for an abuse of discretion the exclusion of expert testimony leading to summary judgment
  • affirming summary judgment based on district court’s determination that plaintiff’s expert testimony lacked foundation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.