Skip to main content
· 5/16/1892

Benson Mining & Smelting Co. v. Alta Mining & Smelting Co.

Citations

  • 145 U.S. 428
  • 12 S. Ct. 877
  • 36 L. Ed. 762
  • 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2152

Syllabus

<p>When the judgment in the Supreme Court of a Territory exceeds $5000 this court has jurisdiction of an appeal, although the judgment in the trial court may have been for a less sum and the jurisdictional amount is reached in the appellate court by adding interest to that judgment.</p> <p>When the price of a mining claim has been paid to the government, the equitable rights of the purchaser are complete, and there.is no obligation on his part to,do further annual work in order to obtain a patent;</p> <p>A person who wrongfully works a mine, takes out ores therefrom, removes them, and converts'thew to his own use is not entitled, in an action to ■ recover their value, to be-credited with the cost of mining the ores.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the differences between patented and unpatented mining claims
  • discussing the differences between patented and unpatented mining claims
  • discussing the differences between patented and unpatented mining claims
  • discussing the differences between patented and unpat-ented mining claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brewer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.