BENSON J. KINNEY vs STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \it is no answer to the application of an erroneous standard of law that the evidence is sufficient to support a verdict reached in accordance with the proper standard of law\
• explaining that “it is no answer to the application of an erroneous standard of law that the evidence is sufficient to support a verdict reached in accordance with the proper standard of law”
• no difference between judge incorrectly instructing jury as to applicable law and in effect incorrectly instructing himself — in both cases conviction has resulted from application of improper standard of law
• no difference between judge incorrectly instructing jury as to applicable law and in effect incorrectly instructing himself - in both cases conviction has resulted from application of improper standard of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).