Skip to main content
· 11/28/1983

Benny Williams v. Robert Kullman and Robert Abrams, Attorney General, State of New York

Citations

  • 722 F.2d 1048
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 14952

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that pleading requirements in habeas proceedings should not be “overly technical and stringent”
  • holding that pleading requirements in habeas proceedings should not be “overly technical and stringent”
  • holding that pleading requirements in habeas proceedings should not be “overly technical and stringent”
  • holding that pleading requirements in habeas proceedings should not be “overly technical and stringent”
  • noting that courts should review pro se habeas 29 petitions with a lenient eye
  • noting that courts should review pro se habeas petitions with a lenient eye

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Cardamone, Winter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.