Skip to main content
· 11/16/2012

Benny Saucier v. Aviva Life and Annuity Company

Citations

  • 701 F.3d 458
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 23531
  • 2012 WL 5658711

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that most federal circuit courts have concluded that the preferred mechanism for relinquishing jurisdiction under the Colorado River abstention doctrine is a stay as opposed to a dismissal; a remand, however, is never an option
  • “If the state court action is able to resolve all of the claims involved in a dispute with respect to all of the parties involved while the federal court action is able to resolve the dispute only partially, this would weigh in favor of abstention.”
  • “If the state court action is able to resolve all of the claims involved in a dispute with respect to all of the parties involved while the federal court action is able to resolve the dispute only partially, this would weigh in favor of abstention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Demoss, Graves

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.