Benny R. Roper v. R. James Nicholson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Court must not construe a statute in a manner that renders one or more of its provisions superfluous, void, or insignificant
• holding that, when a separate rating has been assigned for a secondary disability and a notice of disagreement has not been filed, 38 C.F.R. § 3.310(a
• noting that a regulation must be interpreted “so that effect is given to all its provisions” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that a regulation must be interpreted \so that effect is given to all its provisions\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that a regulation must be interpreted \so that effect is given to all its provisions\
• acknowledging that \service connection may be established on a secondary basis\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).