Bennigno R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that child welfare considerations “are rarely, if ever, static” and that “it is more likely that the child’s environment is constantly evolving”
• holding that a parent waived his claim that ADES did not make diligent efforts to provide appropriate reunification services by failing to request additional services before the second severance hearing
• recognizing child welfare considerations “are rarely, if ever, static” and “it is more likely that the child’s environment is constantly evolving”
• noting that courts can summarily reject arguments \[b]ased on the lack of proper and meaningful argument\
• recognizing factors that favor a finding that termination is in the best interests of the child include: (1) whether an adoption plan exists; and (2) whether the placement meets the needs of the child
• noting we may reject an argument based on lack of proper and meaningful argument alone

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).