Skip to main content
· 6/1/1989

Bennie Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 877 F.2d 170
  • 50 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39,077
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 7820
  • 50 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that we may appoint counsel for an indigent litigant upon a showing that the appeal has “likely merit”
  • noting that an indigent plaintiff that is a prison inmate may have no effective means of bringing his claim to the attention of counsel
  • stating that the courts should not appoint pro bono counsel “indiscriminately,” because “volunteer lawyer time is a precious commodity” that “should not be allocated arbitrarily”
  • stating that we may 11 appoint counsel for an indigent litigant upon a showing that the appeal has 12 “likely merit”
  • noting that “every assignment of a volunteer lawyer to an undeserving client deprives society of a volunteer lawyer available for a deserving cause”
  • emphasizing that an indigent litigant must “first pass the test of likely merit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oakes, Newman, Leval

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.