Bennett v. Weimar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court was correct to not consider a plaintiff's response to a summary judgment motion because the response was not notarized and did not meet the requirements of AS 09.63.020(a)
• noting that parties may rely upon verified pleadings when opposing summary judgment
• \[Alssertions of fact in unverified pleadings and memoranda cannot be relied on in denying a motion for summary judgment.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).