Bennett v. United States
Citations
- 227 U.S. 333
- 33 S. Ct. 288
- 57 L. Ed. 531
- 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2303
Syllabus
<p>. Il'oke v. United Stales, ante, p. 30(8, followed to effect that the White Slave/Traffic Act of June 25, 1910, is constitutional.</p> <p>A variance'in names cannot prejudice defendant if' the allegation in the indictment and the ■'proof . so. correspond that the defendant \\is informed of- the charge and protected against another prosecution for the same offense.</p> <p>Variances as to the.name of the woman transported or in the place' «'here the tickets were procured or as to the number .transported, be-tween the indictment and proof of offenses under the White Slave Traffic Act held not to have prejudiced the defendants and not to be reversible error.</p> <p>Instructions to the'jury that there is testimony tending to corroborate the-testimony of.a witness charged with being an accomplice and ,that it is for the-jury to consider the force and value.of the testimony •and the weight to be given to it; is sufficient to properly leave the matter with the jury.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the use of a victim’s alias in an indictment caused the defendant no prejudice
- variance between White Slave Act indictment allegation that defendant transported woman named “Opal Clarke” and proof that she was known as “Opal” and “Nellie” but that her true name was Jeannette Laplante” was immaterial variance because the defendant knew the victim as “Opal Clarke”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKenna
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1935-04-15· cited 4,581×
- Byrd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-03-30· cited 373×
- United States v. RagenSupreme Court· 1942-02-02· cited 226×
- The Kansas City Star Company v. United States of America, Emil A. Sees v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1957-03-13· cited 103×
- Commonwealth v. SnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1930-01-06· cited 82×
- Sugarman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1919-03-03· cited 77×
- Cwach v. United States. Batsell v. United States. Moore v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1954-04-29· cited 69×
- Diggs v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1915-03-18· cited 56×
- Ernest 'Duke' Arnold v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1964-10-12· cited 49×
- United States v. HopfUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1952-08-14· cited 38×
- Freed v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1920-04-05· cited 35×
- United States v. SchneidermanS.D. California· 1952-08-18· cited 31×
- Harris Calvin Jacobs v. United States of America, Burton S. Wolcoff v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1968-05-21· cited 29×
- United States v. CraigUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1957-09-06· cited 22×
- Ulmer v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1915-02-02· cited 22×
- State v. PenderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2015-09-01· cited 20×
- United States v. William Coy DavisFifth Circuit· 1979-04-12· cited 18×
- Jones v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-05-07· cited 15×
- Beavers v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1925-02-02· cited 14×
- United States v. AustrewD. Maryland· 1962-02-26· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.